ساحت‌های نوین تربیت افسران اطلاعاتی در شرایط متحول (با تأکید بر غافلگیری اطلاعاتی)

8.AYIM, M (1974) 'Retroduction: the reational instinct', Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Vol.10, No. 1, p. 34-43.

9.CORICELLI, G and RUSTICHINI, A (2010) 'Counterfactual thinking and emotions: regret and envy learning', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol.365, No. p. 241-47.

10.DANERMARK, B, EKSTRÖM, M, JAKOBSEN, L, and KARLSSON, J C (1997) Generalization, scientific inference and models for an explanatory social science in Berth Danermark (Eds.) Explaining Society: Critical realism in the social sciences, Ablingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

11.DAN MEYER, S B, WARD, P R, COVENEY, J, and ROGERS, W (2008) 'Trust in the health system: an analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann', Health Sociology Review, Vol.17, No. 2, p. 177-86. ERMARK, B. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.

12.RAGIN, C C (1994) The Process of Social Research: Ideans and Evidence in Charles C. Ragin (Eds.) Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks CA:

13.Roese, N. & Olson, J. (1990). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In Olson, J. (Ed.), What might have been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 199-232.

14.Miller, D. & Turnbull, W. (1992). The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. In Lerner, M. (Ed.), Life Crises and Experiences of Loss, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 179–193.

15.Sherman, S. & McConnell, A. (1995). Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us. In Olson, J. (Ed.), What might have been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 199-232.

16.Samantha B. Meyer and Belinda Lunnay,Sociological Research Online, 18 (1) 12.